the basics

Here is the foundation of many of the posts that will follow; I need it here to refer to later.

mechanics

The mechanics aim to create a collaborative, competitive narrative.

1. Time line

The mush runs for 1 RL year. The game is divided into three acts, each about four months long. After each act players can recreate characters (up to the same ability level of their original character) if they want to. Depending on how the game progresses and what the players want, the acts may not proceed linearly.

2. CG

Step One:

The game contains two ‘decks’, of fates and goals. The game randomly deals the character a:

Fate: Unavoidable and predetermined, though the player chooses how to play it. Example: you will give your enemies your trust if they ask for it.

Goal: An achievement the character strives for. Example: assassinate the mayor of Seattle.

Developers seed the fate and goal decks on an ongoing basis. It’s unlikely two characters will share the same fate or goal.

Fates never change; goals can change, never more frequently than once per act.

The game contains a set of totems and warps. A totem is an entity that watches over or assists a person. A warp is a flaw that nevertheless can fill a need.

The game marks a character with one totem and one warp. That character then owns this totem and warp in the game. There is a limited set of totems and warps; therefore players collaboratively own totems and warps. Initially, a player does not know what totem and warp marked their character — they learn this in play (within the first two weeks — it is revealed by the game when they receive their first story point pay out).

Totems show themselves as tattoos and marks; warps manifest as signs and signatures.

Step two:

The game gives the character ten story points to spend on abilities. A story point is the currency you use throughout the game to raise abilities and affect the game world.

An ability can be an attribute such as strength, a skill such as martial arts, or a special resource of stuff, like a gun collection, that have a good, elite, or legendary rating. The rating is just a value applied to any ability, so different characters can have good strength and elite strength.

The player tags each ability they create with either one totem or one warp.

The player should think about how an ability will help their character concept move the story forward, and has complete freedom to choose their abilities keeping in mind these base costs:

A good rated ability costs 1 story point.

An elite ability costs 3 story points.

A legendary ability costs 5 story points.

However the base cost is not the actual, net cost in story points you pay to buy the ability. Two rules determine the net cost.

The first rule is that abilities must stack. In other words, you cannot have a legendary ability without an elite and good ability as well. In order to have two legendary abilities, you must have at least two elite, and at least two good abilities.

The second rule is that to find the net cost of an ability, you add the total number of your abilities plus how many abilities are stacked below the ability you’re improving to the base cost. The stack counts all abilities below the ability the character raises — not just the abilities stacked directly below like a column, but all abilities stacked below like a pyramid. If you’re raising a current ability and not buying a new one, don’t count the raised ability in the total number of abilities.

For example, to take one good ability costs 1 story point (sp).

To take two good abilities costs 1 sp for the first ability, and 2 sp for the second, for a total of 3 sp.

To take one elite ability cots 1 sp for the first good ability, and 5 sp (Base of 3 + 1 stacked + 1 abilities) for the elite ability, for a total of
6 sp.

To take one legendary ability would cost 1 sp for the first good ability, 5 sp for the next elite ability, and 9 sp (Base of 5 + 2 stacked + 2 abilities) for the legendary ability, for a total of 15 sp.

As another example, take a character who has been in the game for a little while. They have three good abilities, and two elite abilities. They want to raise one of their elite abilities to legendary. The cost would be (5 base + 4 stacked + (5 total – 1 being raised = 4 total), 13 story points.

Unused story points are held in the character’s story book (more on this later) when they enter the game.

A word about buying abilities: in this system a character in the game with enough story points can buy a legendary ability without raising a previously held ability to that level. This is meant to incorporate surprise and unpredictability, and allow the player to add a somewhat unrealistic element to the game.

Step three:

Staff approves the character. You don’t need to write a background, description, or set any information you don’t want to. Obviously if you make more information available, you have a better chance of finding RP with people that don’t know you. The staff approval is mostly to look at your abilities and formally check you in to the game.

3. Game play

Once a RL week upon login, the game gives each player 2 story points. If you don’t login that week, your character doesn’t get the points. You can use sps at any time; however, story points resets to 0 at the end of every RL month. Note that the ability and trust pools do not reset — more about these below.

Props:

A prop is a significant element of the narrative and game world, and can be a thing, place, person, and one-time or ongoing event. The developers seed the prop list on an ongoing basis.

For example, Mount Rainier is a prop, but a gun is not a prop. All props are listed with a brief description in the prop list — if it isn’t in the list, it isn’t a current prop in the system. Some examples are:

  • a remote cabin hidden in the Cascades (an element of the game world)
  • a friend who works in Civil Services (a NPC, also an element of the game world)
  • activists march downtown (a piece of story, an element of the narrative)

Props are either special, rare, or unique. For example, Mount Rainier is a unique prop, but a friend who works in Civil Services is a special prop.

Players buy props in order to have narrative control of what they represent. The idea is that players should be able to affect, and be affected by, the game world without staff intervention, and with a clear mechanic that decides who ultimately gets to decide what. If a player owns a prop, the final decision is theirs.

Players buy props with story points at these costs:

special: 1 sp
rare: 4 sp
unique: 10 sp

To take an extreme case, if a player did own Mount Rainier, they could narrate events on the mountain like weather, avalanches, lost climbers, or an eruption. Keep in mind that props are meant to be used to advance the story, not blow it up. Another player could narrate events on the mountain as well, but if there is a conflict in the narrative, the final decision rests with the prop owner. A prop short-circuits the normal process where a player would get staff approval for something that affects the game world; in this regard, a prop is like a temporary staff bit that decides outcomes for a very specific piece of the game.

Players can sell props to other players at any price in sps that they agree to; they can also sell back to the prop list and receive half the original cost or 1 sp, whichever is greater.

When players want a prop, they look at what’s available in the prop list. They then make a bid on the prop. If no other player bids on the prop within 24 RL hours, the player buys the prop; if another player does bid on the prop, each player rolls a d6, with the highest roll earning the player the right to buy the prop. Players may spend story points to raise their roll on a 1:1 basis in a contested bid.

At the end of every act, all props return to the prop list, and characters do not receive sps in return.

Inevitably two players will go toe to toe. Each will own a prop that can affect the outcome of the scene. Which prop takes precedence?

The golden rule of conflicted props is called point-of-view. Point-of-view means who has authorial control of a part of the narrative. The mush is consent-based, so by default the overall game narrative has a neutral point-of-view (nPOV). No one character has the right to dictate what other characters will do or be affected by. Instead the players mutually agree to the actions and consequences of a scene.

However the mush also is a competitive narrative, which means players have interests and goals, and the means (abilities) and resources (props) to carry out those interests and goals. If a player owns a prop, that prop is in their personal point-of-view (pPOV), much like an extension of their character. They have narrative control of that prop. So when two props are in conflict, what you essentially have is a dispute over POV.

For example, consider this question, courtesy of Thenomain @ WORA:

“Say I brought my CIA Buddy (rare prop) and wore my futuristic bulletproof clothing (special prop) onto your Mt. Ranier (unique prop) where you are hiding.

It’s my CIA Buddy (hunting you down) vs. your Mt. Ranier (hiding you). Both are props, but have conflicting narratives. What happens next?”

The players have two choices.

1. Maintain nPOV. They come to a mutual agreement about the result of the scene.

Buffy: “OK, my CIA friend Jack got some intel on your hideout in the mountain via satellite. We know where you are and we’re going to bust in on you guns blazing.”

Biff: “OK, but it so happens that today the mountain is in white-out conditions…no helicopter is landing on the mountain.”

Buffy: “Well, we have your location via GPS so the white-out won’t stop us finding you. We’ll just go in on foot.”

Biff: “Fine.”

2. Decide who has pPOV — personal point of view. The player that takes pPOV awards a story point to the player who owns the prop that was superseded.

Buffy: “OK, Jack and I are going to cap your ass. We’re coming in on a helicopter.”

Biff: “Uh, how are you going to find me? The mountain is in a whiteout today.”

Buffy: “Whiteout? That seems like an easy out to me.”

Biff: “Well…OK, I’m willing to give you pPOV. There’s a break in the weather.”

Buffy: “Cool. Here’s a sp. Hope your gun is big.”

Buffy declares her +prop of Jack, CIA agent. Biff declares his +prop of Mount Rainier. Both declare they want +pov over the other player’s prop (Buffy declares +pov me), but Biff acquiesces, +pov Buffy, and Biff gets a sp.

It is only when a player wishes to have pPOV that you award story points; if all players in the scene want to give up POV, they need to work it out using nPOV.

If there are three or more players in a scene, individual prop conflicts are worked out between the affected players. It is possible for one player who assumes pPOV to award a story point to each affected player who gives up pPOV.

What if neither player wants to give up POV, and can’t agree on nPOV? What resolves the conflict?

Conflict resolution with dice:

The mush is consent-based, but in the event that players want to judge a conflict with dice, players do this:

1. roll a d10.

2. add bonuses. Ability ratings give: good +1, elite +2, legendary +3. Prop give: special +2, rare +4, unique +6.

3. subtract an opposing roll or named difficulty. Difficulties are hard (4), unlikely (6), and incredible (8)

4. The number of successes is any positive result. Any negative result is the number of failures, according to this scale:

-3+: tragic -2: horrible -1: bad 0: re roll (tie) 1: good 2: great 3+: extraordinary

The player who initiates the roll is the enactor; the enactor narrates a failure. The player who makes an opposing role is the adversary; the adversary narrates any success. If there is no PC adversary, the enactor narrates the success.

Players are expected to judiciously apply prop bonuses to rolls. Dice are meant to add an element of chance and uncertainty to outcomes, and allow players to think of clever tactics and ways to utilize their abilities and resources in a situation. They are not just a substitute for consent.

Every time you apply a bonus the contested player can choose to refresh or deplete your bonus pool (never more than the maximum). Bonus pools refresh to maximum once at the start of every RL month.


Play of Fate and Goals:

A character plays their fate and goals by working them into their RP. For example, if my goal is to assassinate the mayor of Seattle, and I obtain a detailed schedule of his activities, I have expressed my goal. If my fate is to trust my enemies if they ask me to, and I do so, I similarly have expressed my fate. Either action is worth 3 story points, if the other players in the scene agree the fate or goal is appropriately played.

Obviously the player must reveal their fate and goal, sometimes to their character’s enemies, to earn points.

Story Points:

There are a few other uses for story points. The following explanation gets a little technical, but here is the main idea — the game does not reward a player who hoards their points in one big glob, waiting for the big spend. .

Players can divide their story points in a few ways:

1. They can hold the sps in one glob to play at any time, to buy props, etcetera. These are uninvested sps.

2. Players may also invest a portion of their story points, naming either a totem or a warp. This is called a trust pool, and players may create one for each warp and totem (or none of them).

3. Players use sps to raise current abilities or buy new ones. Players must invest points in their ability pool and declare the ability they’re working on. When the pool reaches the total needed, the player gets the ability, with any remainder remaining in the ability pool. Players can work on only one ability at a time. To flush the pool before the the ability is ‘ready’, the player will only receive 50% of the pool as a refund.

Every week when players receive their story points on login, the game ALSO increases a player’s trust pools by 10%; each trust pool increases by 10%. The game increases the ability pool by 20%. Fractions of story points are unusable, but the game keeps track of the fractional amounts (always rounding up to tenths) and adds to the pool appropriately. However, interest does NOT compound without the pool being active — that is, without a player declaring what ability they’re working on. To activiate the ability pool, the player must invest at least 1 sp and name an ability.

For example, Buffy wants elite computer hacking, which will cost her 5 sps. Currently she has 3 sps. She puts 2 sps into an elite computer hacking ability pool — these sps are unavailable for play. The following week when the game gives out story points, Buffy receives an extra 0.4 sps in her ability pool, increasing it to 2.4. That week she doesn’t put any points in her ability pool. The following week the game puts .5 sps in her ability pool, increasing it to 2.9. That week she puts 1 sp in the pool, raising it to 3.9; she receives elite computer hacking, and 0.9 points remain in the ability pool for the next investment.

Hooks:

A hook is initially a seed for RP. Some players make a character, enter the game world, and then don’t know where to start. Hooks give them something to riff off of to start their RP, or they provide ideas for characters mid-story who don’t have something going on. Hooks also provide a mechanism for two players who don’t normally RP together, because of login times or inclination or other RP reasons, to riff of of each other’s RP.

Hooks usually take the form of subject verb props. For example:

The police are investigating a ring of organ thieves. :: ring of organ thieves PROP owned by Biff
A gang, the New Bloods, is making a play for more territory. :: the New Bloods gang PROP owned by Boffo
A foreign activist is seeking political asylum. :: foreign activist PROP owned by Buffy

Developers seed the game with hooks, which players can check out for play. Once they do something with it they check it back in with a concise summary of changes for other players to pick up on.

Hooks have a return date, like a library book, usually posted 1 week from the check out. Players renew hooks to get more time, but players may place a hold on hooks, and hooks on hold are automatically checked in by the return date. If a hook already is on hold players can put themselves in the hold queue, and remove themselves from it at any time. If the players have not provided a summary of changes by this date, they lose 1 sp. They of course can return the hook before the due date without changes if they wish, but it is assumed they did nothing with the hook.

Of course you need two or more players to check out a hook. One player in the group signs for the hooks; a player may only be signed out on one hook at a time. Players may add another player to a hook checked out, but may not remove a player from that hook.

Obviously the game does not parse the semantics of hook summaries. However this doesn’t mean it won’t be clear who did and didn’t update the summary legibly.

Players don’t own hooks like they do props, but they do have the freedom to decide how a hook will progress, within the constraints of consent and any props that are involved.

Let’s take the first hook example to study:

The police are investigating a ring of organ thieves.

Buffy and Biff check out this hook. Assuming they don’t just TS the whole week, they play a few scenes. Biff owns the ring of organ thieves, so he has narrative control of this prop. The result of their RP is that a cop gets kidnapped and a kidney removed. They check the hook back in a week later, and it now looks like this:

The police are investigating a ring of organ thieves. Jack Hardnut, SPD, got kidnapped and lost a kidney. :: ring of organ thieves PROP owned by Biff

Players do not need to play a hook linearly; for example, our two players could have RPed and checked the hook back in to look like:

A young girl got kidnapped and lost a kidney. As a result, the police are investigating a ring of organ thieves. :: ring of organ thieves PROP owned by Biff

A note about narrating for NPCS. If an NPC is not explicitly listed as a prop, and narrating the NPC doesn’t make a significant change to the game or its props, a player is free to narrate the NPC. If narrating the NPC affects someone else’s prop or the game, get the consent of the other player or the game first. One important note is that you don’t need to get consent for minor property damage, for example breaking a window or tagging a car. Just use common sense — if you burned down someone’s apartment, that is not minor property damage.

Hook relations: As players play hooks, and the hooks grow, there must be a chance of the narrative threads colliding and interweaving. Relations are the rules that guide hook collision.


Summary on how to get story points:

You get 2 sps per week.

Hook rewards: At the beginning of each act the game looks at all the hooks in play. It ranks the most popular hooks (by active hooks returned with summaries updated by their due date). For each of the top 10% of hooks, ALL players that checked out that hook receive 50% of the number of checkouts in sps.

Trust rewards: At the beginning of each act the game looks at the cumulative total of all trust pools to date; characters earn 20% of their trust pools in sps.

If a player invokes another player’s ability, the invoked player has the choice to award a story point for that.

If a player gives up POV, they can get a sp from the player that takes pPOV.

If a player plays their fate or goal, they can get 3 sps.

One player cannot award more than X points to another player in a RL week

Advertisements

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: